hat sich ja auch kürzlich ein Australier patentieren lassen.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc976.txt
Bell Laboratories, Mark. R. Horton
February 1986
UUCP Mail Interchange Format Standard
http://www.fedcir.gov/opinions/03-1615.pdf
NTP’s U.S. Patents Nos. 5,436,960 (“the ’960 patent”); 5,625,670
(“the ’670 patent”); 5,819,172 (“the ’172 patent”); 6,067,451 (“the
’451 patent”); and 6,317,592 (“the ’592 patent”) (collectively, “the
patents-in-suit”)
I. BACKGROUND
The technology at issue relates to systems for integrating existing
electronic mail systems (“wireline” systems) with radio frequency
(“RF”) wireless communication networks, to enable a mobile user to
receive email over a wireless network.
...
A. Overview of Electronic Mail Technology
Traditional email systems operate in the following manner: To send an
email, a user begins by composing a message in his or her email
client. An “email client” is a user interface, such as Microsoft
Outlook, Eudora, or Hotmail™, that organizes and displays a user’s
email messages and provides the user with a means of creating and
sending email messages.
...
The ’960 patent, filed on May 20, 1991, is the parent of a string of
continuation applications.
Campana’s particular innovation was to integrate existing electronic
mail systems with RF wireless communications networks. See ’960
patent,.."
Ich ab heut keine Lust, mir soviel englischen Text anzutun.
Hat hier nicht jemand den Überblick, ob das, was die sich ab 1991 als
"Push-Technologie" haben patentieren lassen, nicht schon hinreichend
in den älteren RFCs beschrieben ist?
Das NTP (network time protocol?) Electronic Mail Technology mit
Outlook beschreibt ist ja wohl Banane.
Falls amerikanische Patentbehörden neue Patente auf das Rad erteilen,
und die Patentinhaber die alleinigen Rechte an allen Rädern
beanspruchen, kann uns das nicht gleichgültig sein.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc976.txt
Bell Laboratories, Mark. R. Horton
February 1986
UUCP Mail Interchange Format Standard
http://www.fedcir.gov/opinions/03-1615.pdf
NTP’s U.S. Patents Nos. 5,436,960 (“the ’960 patent”); 5,625,670
(“the ’670 patent”); 5,819,172 (“the ’172 patent”); 6,067,451 (“the
’451 patent”); and 6,317,592 (“the ’592 patent”) (collectively, “the
patents-in-suit”)
I. BACKGROUND
The technology at issue relates to systems for integrating existing
electronic mail systems (“wireline” systems) with radio frequency
(“RF”) wireless communication networks, to enable a mobile user to
receive email over a wireless network.
...
A. Overview of Electronic Mail Technology
Traditional email systems operate in the following manner: To send an
email, a user begins by composing a message in his or her email
client. An “email client” is a user interface, such as Microsoft
Outlook, Eudora, or Hotmail™, that organizes and displays a user’s
email messages and provides the user with a means of creating and
sending email messages.
...
The ’960 patent, filed on May 20, 1991, is the parent of a string of
continuation applications.
Campana’s particular innovation was to integrate existing electronic
mail systems with RF wireless communications networks. See ’960
patent,.."
Ich ab heut keine Lust, mir soviel englischen Text anzutun.
Hat hier nicht jemand den Überblick, ob das, was die sich ab 1991 als
"Push-Technologie" haben patentieren lassen, nicht schon hinreichend
in den älteren RFCs beschrieben ist?
Das NTP (network time protocol?) Electronic Mail Technology mit
Outlook beschreibt ist ja wohl Banane.
Falls amerikanische Patentbehörden neue Patente auf das Rad erteilen,
und die Patentinhaber die alleinigen Rechte an allen Rädern
beanspruchen, kann uns das nicht gleichgültig sein.