From the executive leadership of top weapons-makers, to the senior government officials designing and purchasing the nation’s military arsenal, the United States’ national defense hierarchy is, for the first time, largely run by women.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/02/how-women-took-over-the-military-industrial-complex-1049860
Wir brauchen auch mehr weibliche Drohnenpiloten! Vong Gleichberechtigung her.
Aber nicht nur bei der Kriegsindustrie ist ein hoher Anteil an Frauen wichtig, auch in politischen Ämtern - denn Frauen sind das friedvollere Geschlecht.
In fact, between 1480 and 1913, Europe’s queens were 27% more likely than its kings to wage war, according to a National Bureau of Economics working paper
https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/
Oder ist ein hoher Frauenanteil etwa gar nicht ein Wert an sich, und man stellt hier - entgegen zu einer mMn. anstrebenswerten Welt, in der das Geschlecht unwichtig geworden ist - das Geschlecht nur aus PR-Gründen und Virtue Signalling in den Vordergrund? Kann nicht sein!11!!
Und bessere Performance bieten solche Firmen auch.
Writing recently on Huffington Post, for example, one consultant observed the following: “Companies with gender-diverse management teams have been proven to consistently perform better and be more profitable than those without them. (..)”
But research conducted by consulting firms and financial institutions is not as rigorous as peer-reviewed academic research. Here, I dig into the findings of rigorous, peer-reviewed studies of the relationship between board gender diversity and company performance.
“Rigorous, peer-reviewed studies suggest that companies do not perform better when they have women on the board. Nor do they perform worse.”
https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/will-gender-diversity-boards-really-boost-company-performance/